cutting down to 16 pages main content
This commit is contained in:
parent
fec688d8bf
commit
c5ed59aca2
@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ instantly that a transaction is valid.
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\begin{tikzpicture}
|
||||
\tikzstyle{def} = [node distance= 5em and 7em, inner sep=1em, outer sep=.3em];
|
||||
\tikzstyle{def} = [node distance= 1em and 11em, inner sep=1em, outer sep=.3em];
|
||||
\node (origin) at (0,0) {};
|
||||
\node (exchange) [def,above=of origin,draw]{Exchange};
|
||||
\node (customer) [def, draw, below left=of origin] {Customer};
|
||||
@ -194,11 +194,8 @@ Yet, there are several major irredeemable problems inherent in their designs:
|
||||
\item Bitcoin transactions have pseduononymous recipients, making taxation
|
||||
hard to systematically enforce.
|
||||
The Zerocoin extension makes this worse.
|
||||
% FIXME: need refs for following claim:
|
||||
\item Bitcoin seemingly requires speculation to offset the mining cost,
|
||||
creating fluctuations in value, and making it hard to bind to national
|
||||
currencies. These fluctuations may be desirable in a high-risk investment
|
||||
instrument, but they make Bitcoin unsuitable as a medium of exchange.
|
||||
\item Bitcoin introduces a new currency, creating additional
|
||||
financial risks from currency fluctuation.
|
||||
\item Anyone can start an alternative Bitcoin transaction chain,
|
||||
called an AltCoin, and, if successful, reap the benefits of the low
|
||||
cost to initially create coins cheaply as the proof-of-work
|
||||
@ -211,15 +208,13 @@ Yet, there are several major irredeemable problems inherent in their designs:
|
||||
% currency exchange and exacerbates the problems with currency fluctuations.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
GreenCoinX\footnote{\url{https://www.greencoinx.com/}} is a more
|
||||
recent AltCoin where the company promises to identify the owner of
|
||||
each coin via e-mail addresses and phone numbers. While it is unclear
|
||||
from their technical description how this identification would be
|
||||
enforced against a determined adversary, the resulting payment system
|
||||
would also merely impose a totalitarian financial panopticon on a
|
||||
BitCoin-style money supply and transaction model, thus largely
|
||||
combining what we would consider to be the drawbacks of existing
|
||||
credit card systems.
|
||||
%GreenCoinX\footnote{\url{https://www.greencoinx.com/}} is a more
|
||||
%recent AltCoin where the company promises to identify the owner of
|
||||
%each coin via e-mail addresses and phone numbers. While it is unclear
|
||||
%from their technical description how this identification would be
|
||||
%enforced against a determined adversary, the resulting payment system
|
||||
%would also merely impose a financial panopticon on a BitCoin-style
|
||||
%money supply and transaction model.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Chaum-style electronic cash}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -238,10 +233,10 @@ include:
|
||||
recover funds from delinquent customers via the legal system.
|
||||
Any system that fails to be self-enforcing creates a major
|
||||
business risk for the exchange and merchants.
|
||||
In 1983, there were merchants without network connectivity, making that
|
||||
feature relevant, but today network connectivity is feasible for most
|
||||
merchants, and saves both the exchange and merchants the business risks
|
||||
associated with deferred fraud detection.
|
||||
% In 1983, there were merchants without network connectivity, making that
|
||||
% feature relevant, but today network connectivity is feasible for most
|
||||
% merchants, and saves both the exchange and merchants the business risks
|
||||
% associated with deferred fraud detection.
|
||||
\item % In addition to the risk of legal disputes with fraudulent
|
||||
% merchants and customers,
|
||||
Chaum's published design does not clearly
|
||||
@ -293,21 +288,21 @@ to what degree the implementation is even complete. Only a partial
|
||||
description of the Opencoin protocol is available to date.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Peppercoin}
|
||||
%\subsection{Peppercoin}
|
||||
|
||||
Peppercoin~\cite{rivest2004peppercoin} is a microdonation protocol.
|
||||
The main idea of the protocol is to reduce transaction costs by
|
||||
minimizing the number of transactions that are processed directly by
|
||||
the exchange. Instead of always paying, the customer ``gambles'' with the
|
||||
merchant for each microdonation. Only if the merchant wins, the
|
||||
microdonation is upgraded to a macropayment to be deposited at the
|
||||
exchange. Peppercoin does not provide customer-anonymity. The proposed
|
||||
statistical method by which exchanges detect fraudulent cooperation between
|
||||
customers and merchants at the expense of the exchange not only creates
|
||||
legal risks for the exchange, but would also require that the exchange learns
|
||||
about microdonations where the merchant did not get upgraded to a
|
||||
macropayment. It is therefore unclear how Peppercoin would actually
|
||||
reduce the computational burden on the exchange.
|
||||
%Peppercoin~\cite{rivest2004peppercoin} is a microdonation protocol.
|
||||
%The main idea of the protocol is to reduce transaction costs by
|
||||
%minimizing the number of transactions that are processed directly by
|
||||
%the exchange. Instead of always paying, the customer ``gambles'' with the
|
||||
%merchant for each microdonation. Only if the merchant wins, the
|
||||
%microdonation is upgraded to a macropayment to be deposited at the
|
||||
%exchange. Peppercoin does not provide customer-anonymity. The proposed
|
||||
%statistical method by which exchanges detect fraudulent cooperation between
|
||||
%customers and merchants at the expense of the exchange not only creates
|
||||
%legal risks for the exchange, but would also require that the exchange learns
|
||||
%about microdonations where the merchant did not get upgraded to a
|
||||
%macropayment. It is therefore unclear how Peppercoin would actually
|
||||
%reduce the computational burden on the exchange.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Design}
|
||||
@ -518,7 +513,7 @@ shared with others, they become co-owners of the coin. Knowledge of
|
||||
the private key of the coin enables the owner to spent the coin.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Coin spending}
|
||||
% \subsection{Coin spending}
|
||||
|
||||
A customer spends a coin at a merchant by cryptographically signing a
|
||||
{\em deposit authorization} with the coin's private key. A deposit
|
||||
@ -1156,6 +1151,12 @@ the participants have to disclose their core secrets.
|
||||
\bibliographystyle{alpha}
|
||||
\bibliography{taler,rfc}
|
||||
|
||||
\vfill
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\Large Demonstration available at \url{https://demo.taler.net/}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\vfill
|
||||
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
\appendix
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user