62 lines
1.5 KiB
JavaScript
62 lines
1.5 KiB
JavaScript
var fs = require('fs');
|
|
var path = require('path');
|
|
var common = require('./common');
|
|
var _ls = require('./ls');
|
|
|
|
common.register('find', _find, {});
|
|
|
|
//@
|
|
//@ ### find(path [, path ...])
|
|
//@ ### find(path_array)
|
|
//@ Examples:
|
|
//@
|
|
//@ ```javascript
|
|
//@ find('src', 'lib');
|
|
//@ find(['src', 'lib']); // same as above
|
|
//@ find('.').filter(function(file) { return file.match(/\.js$/); });
|
|
//@ ```
|
|
//@
|
|
//@ Returns array of all files (however deep) in the given paths.
|
|
//@
|
|
//@ The main difference from `ls('-R', path)` is that the resulting file names
|
|
//@ include the base directories, e.g. `lib/resources/file1` instead of just `file1`.
|
|
function _find(options, paths) {
|
|
if (!paths) {
|
|
common.error('no path specified');
|
|
} else if (typeof paths === 'string') {
|
|
paths = [].slice.call(arguments, 1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var list = [];
|
|
|
|
function pushFile(file) {
|
|
if (process.platform === 'win32') {
|
|
file = file.replace(/\\/g, '/');
|
|
}
|
|
list.push(file);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// why not simply do ls('-R', paths)? because the output wouldn't give the base dirs
|
|
// to get the base dir in the output, we need instead ls('-R', 'dir/*') for every directory
|
|
|
|
paths.forEach(function (file) {
|
|
var stat;
|
|
try {
|
|
stat = fs.statSync(file);
|
|
} catch (e) {
|
|
common.error('no such file or directory: ' + file);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pushFile(file);
|
|
|
|
if (stat.isDirectory()) {
|
|
_ls({ recursive: true, all: true }, file).forEach(function (subfile) {
|
|
pushFile(path.join(file, subfile));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
return list;
|
|
}
|
|
module.exports = _find;
|