fix bug in retrying logic for reserve status
This commit is contained in:
parent
c89c90b7fa
commit
211e8c25d5
1531
lib/vendor/system-csp-production.src.js
vendored
1531
lib/vendor/system-csp-production.src.js
vendored
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ export class ChromeBadge implements Badge {
|
||||
constructor(window?: Window) {
|
||||
// Allow injecting another window for testing
|
||||
let bg = window || chrome.extension.getBackgroundPage();
|
||||
if (!bg) {
|
||||
throw Error("no window available");
|
||||
}
|
||||
this.canvas = bg.document.createElement("canvas");
|
||||
// Note: changing the width here means changing the font
|
||||
// size in draw() as well!
|
||||
|
@ -612,8 +612,7 @@ export class Wallet {
|
||||
* First fetch information requred to withdraw from the reserve,
|
||||
* then deplete the reserve, withdrawing coins until it is empty.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private processReserve(reserveRecord: any): void {
|
||||
let retryDelayMs = 100;
|
||||
private processReserve(reserveRecord: any, retryDelayMs: number = 250): void {
|
||||
const opId = "reserve-" + reserveRecord.reserve_pub;
|
||||
this.startOperation(opId);
|
||||
this.updateExchangeFromUrl(reserveRecord.exchange_base_url)
|
||||
@ -633,11 +632,10 @@ export class Wallet {
|
||||
return Query(this.db).put("history", depleted).finish();
|
||||
})
|
||||
.catch((e) => {
|
||||
console.error("Failed to deplete reserve");
|
||||
console.error(e);
|
||||
setTimeout(() => this.processReserve(reserveRecord), retryDelayMs);
|
||||
// exponential backoff truncated at one minute
|
||||
retryDelayMs = Math.min(retryDelayMs * 2, 1000 * 60);
|
||||
// random, exponential backoff truncated at 3 minutes
|
||||
let nextDelay = Math.min(2 * retryDelayMs + retryDelayMs * Math.random(), 3000 * 60);
|
||||
console.warn(`Failed to deplete reserve, trying again in ${retryDelayMs} ms`);
|
||||
setTimeout(() => this.processReserve(reserveRecord, nextDelay), retryDelayMs);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user