From cc97a4dd2a967e1c2273bd5f4c5f49a5bf2e2585 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Dold <florian.dold@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:01:33 +0100
Subject: remove node_modules

---
 node_modules/array-uniq/index.js | 62 ----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 62 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 node_modules/array-uniq/index.js

(limited to 'node_modules/array-uniq/index.js')

diff --git a/node_modules/array-uniq/index.js b/node_modules/array-uniq/index.js
deleted file mode 100644
index edd09f811..000000000
--- a/node_modules/array-uniq/index.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-'use strict';
-
-// there's 3 implementations written in increasing order of efficiency
-
-// 1 - no Set type is defined
-function uniqNoSet(arr) {
-	var ret = [];
-
-	for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
-		if (ret.indexOf(arr[i]) === -1) {
-			ret.push(arr[i]);
-		}
-	}
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-// 2 - a simple Set type is defined
-function uniqSet(arr) {
-	var seen = new Set();
-	return arr.filter(function (el) {
-		if (!seen.has(el)) {
-			seen.add(el);
-			return true;
-		}
-
-		return false;
-	});
-}
-
-// 3 - a standard Set type is defined and it has a forEach method
-function uniqSetWithForEach(arr) {
-	var ret = [];
-
-	(new Set(arr)).forEach(function (el) {
-		ret.push(el);
-	});
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-// V8 currently has a broken implementation
-// https://github.com/joyent/node/issues/8449
-function doesForEachActuallyWork() {
-	var ret = false;
-
-	(new Set([true])).forEach(function (el) {
-		ret = el;
-	});
-
-	return ret === true;
-}
-
-if ('Set' in global) {
-	if (typeof Set.prototype.forEach === 'function' && doesForEachActuallyWork()) {
-		module.exports = uniqSetWithForEach;
-	} else {
-		module.exports = uniqSet;
-	}
-} else {
-	module.exports = uniqNoSet;
-}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3