From e76210a0a02af835fe6fc36ee6056402c421dbb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:33:29 +0200
Subject: Another comment about BOLT, not sure if I want to say this

---
 articles/ui/ui.tex | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'articles/ui/ui.tex')

diff --git a/articles/ui/ui.tex b/articles/ui/ui.tex
index 8f2433d9e..9918b56b1 100644
--- a/articles/ui/ui.tex
+++ b/articles/ui/ui.tex
@@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ transfers through bank-like intermediaries.  Although interesting,
 there are numerous seemingly fragile aspects of the BOLT protocol,
 including aborts deanonymizing customers, intermetdiaries risking
 unlimited losses, and theft if a party fails to post a refute message
-in a timely fashion.
+in a timely fashion.  
+% If these issues could be addressed, 
+% % and the relatively advanced crypto involved became production ready,
+% then Taler might be the best platform for deploying a BOLT-like scheme.
 
 % In addition, the Bitcoin protocol does not interact well with
 % conventional anonymity networks like Tor \cite{BTC:vsTor}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

