From 7f28ae4481365cabc81dbf483e446e574e622976 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=C3=96zg=C3=BCr=20Kesim?= Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 07:56:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] added not on fungiblity --- eipsi2024/eipsi2024.tex | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eipsi2024/eipsi2024.tex b/eipsi2024/eipsi2024.tex index 0f5f168..2d92c6e 100644 --- a/eipsi2024/eipsi2024.tex +++ b/eipsi2024/eipsi2024.tex @@ -1057,12 +1057,14 @@ Searching for functions \uncover<2->{with the following signatures} \begin{frame}{Discussion}{Potential for misuse} \begin{itemize}[<+->] \item Instead of age groups, couldn't the scheme encode \textit{arbitrary} semantics? - \item Yes, but \textit{implementation} in GNU Taler only allows for arithmetic comparison - \item Problem already exists with denomitations keys: + \item Yes, but \textit{implementation} in GNU Taler only allows for arithmetic comparison. + \item Note that augmented coin material (coin + age commitment) remains fungible. + \vfill + \item Problem of tainting already exists with denomitations keys: \item They could be used to seperate the anonymity set of users. \vfill \item GNU Taler defines the role of an \textit{Auditor}: - \item a seperate entity to supervise the operation of the exchange + \item a seperate entity to supervise the operation of the exchange. \end{itemize} \end{frame}