remove comment about un-instantiated protocol
This commit is contained in:
parent
7c4153d403
commit
e6d61f666b
@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
|
||||
\usetikzlibrary{positioning}
|
||||
\usetikzlibrary{calc}
|
||||
\usepackage{eurosym}
|
||||
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% Copyright
|
||||
|
@ -150,10 +150,8 @@ Specific comments:
|
||||
> Yes, juxtaposition denotes multiplication. "commit to disk" has been
|
||||
> changed to "persist", the customer must persis the value before making the
|
||||
> bank transaction, so that they don't lose their reserve key should the system
|
||||
> crash. It is used to restart the operation in case of a crash.
|
||||
> Where the blinding factor "b" is selected from depends on the instantiation
|
||||
> of the protocol, it's simply a fresh blinding factor in the blind signature
|
||||
> scheme.
|
||||
> crash.
|
||||
> We added some clarification about to where random values are selected from.
|
||||
|
||||
- Section 4.1, step 3, what is the key K used in FDH? Also is S_w(B) a standard
|
||||
signature?
|
||||
@ -189,8 +187,7 @@ Specific comments:
|
||||
denotes? Is that a commitment (as noted in the text) or a signature (as noted
|
||||
in notation table?).
|
||||
|
||||
> We multiply t_s^(i) with G, so the only reasonable domain is
|
||||
> [1,n] where n is the order of the elliptic curve we use.
|
||||
> We clarified what t_s^(i) is.
|
||||
> S_{C’} is a signature made with private key C’_p, what we sign
|
||||
> over is the commitment.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user