From 239c25e4dabfb7731e6ca829af541841020a2ced Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeffrey Burdges Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 13:31:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Mention BOLT here Do we need this though? If so, do we need a reference to the proposals? --- doc/paper/taler.tex | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/paper/taler.tex b/doc/paper/taler.tex index 30f9934c3..0bc678f1c 100644 --- a/doc/paper/taler.tex +++ b/doc/paper/taler.tex @@ -997,8 +997,11 @@ maximum applicable tax is less than $\frac{2}{3}$, then $\kappa = 3$ ensures that cheating results in a negative financial return on average as $\kappa - 1$ out of $\kappa$ attempts to hide from taxation are detected and penalized by a total loss. This makes our use of -cut-and-choose practical and efficient, and in particular faster -than the comparable use of zk-SNARKs in ZeroCash~\cite{zerocash}. +cut-and-choose practical and efficient, orders of magnitude faster +than comparable proposed uses of zk-SNARKs in ZeroCash~\cite{zerocash} +and orders of magnitude more more bandwidth efficient than +comparable proposed uses of zero-knowledge proof in BOLT~\cite{BOLT}. +% TODO: Mention Zerocash linkability ideas? % FIXME: I'm explicit about the rounds in postquantum.tex