Make double pending Exculpability section about prevention
This commit is contained in:
parent
4689610a1f
commit
02a3f3d96e
@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ protocol is never used.
|
||||
\subsection{Exculpability arguments}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma:double-spending}
|
||||
The exchange can detect and prove double-spending.
|
||||
The exchange can detect, prevent, and prove double-spending.
|
||||
\end{lemma}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
@ -1417,13 +1417,15 @@ obtains either a deposit-permission or a refresh-record, both of which
|
||||
contain a signature made with the public key of coin to authorizing the
|
||||
respective operation. If the exchange has a set of refresh-records and
|
||||
deposit-permissions whose total value exceed the value of the coin, the
|
||||
exchange can show this set to prove that double-spending was attempted.
|
||||
exchange can show this set to prove that double-spending is being
|
||||
attempted and justify rejecting the operation.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{corollary}
|
||||
Merchants and customers can verify double-spending proofs by verifying that the
|
||||
signatures in the set of refresh-records and deposit-permissions are correct and
|
||||
that the total value exceeds the coin's value.
|
||||
Merchants and customers can verify proofs of double-spending attempts
|
||||
by verifying that the signatures in the set of refresh-records and
|
||||
deposit-permissions are correct and that the total value would exceed
|
||||
the coin's value.
|
||||
\end{corollary}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{lemma}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user